The problem? It’s a terrible idea in practice. Not because the wealthy shouldn’t contribute more, but because a traditional wealth tax is among the most inefficient and economically damaging ways to do it.

But what if there was another way? A way to tax wealth that is fair, efficient, and actually encourages economic growth? Enter the Land Value Tax (LVT). This is a classic idea with surprisingly radical roots, championed by social reformers and economists who believed that the value of land, a common resource, should benefit society as a whole.

Why a General Wealth Tax Fails

Let's quickly look at why an annual levy on total net worth is a bad idea.

• Capital Flight: Wealthy individuals are globally mobile. Their yachts, art, stock portfolios, and private equity stakes can be moved to more favourable jurisdictions with the click of a button. A UK wealth tax risks an exodus of capital and entrepreneurs, shrinking the very tax base it targets.

• A valuation nightmare: How do you value a private company or a vintage car collection every single year? The administrative burden would be colossal, creating an army of tax avoidance advisors and clogging up HMRC with endless disputes.

• It Taxes Productive Assets: A wealth tax penalises the very act of creating and accumulating capital that fuels investment, job creation, and innovation. It taxes the factory, the startup equity, and the machinery of the economy itself.

In short, it’s a policy that has been tried and abandoned by most European countries that attempted it for the simple reason that it’s fiendishly complex and economically counterproductive.

A Better Idea: Tax the Land

A Land Value Tax is, in principle, elegantly simple. It is an annual tax on the unimproved value of land, and only the land.

It completely ignores the value of the buildings, renovations, or machinery on top of it. You could own two identical plots of land side-by-side in central London; one a derelict patch of weeds and the other holding a £500 million skyscraper. With an LVT, the tax bill on both plots would be exactly the same.

The principle is this: the value of a location is not created by the individual landowner. It is created by the community and the state. The presence of nearby Tube stations, good schools, a thriving economy, and a safe society is what makes a patch of earth in Mayfair worth millions. That value is created by the community. Proponents of LVT argue it's therefore the fairest and most efficient thing to tax.

The Good, the Bad, and the Practical

The Upside:

• Hyper-Efficient: Land is the only asset that cannot be moved to Monaco or hidden in a vault. Its supply is fixed. Taxing it doesn’t stop anyone from working harder or investing in a business. As such, most economists agree it's the most efficient tax in the playbook.

• It Kills Speculation: LVT makes it expensive to sit on valuable, underdeveloped land. The owner of a vacant lot in a city centre would face a significant annual bill, creating a powerful incentive to either build something productive on it or sell it to someone who will. This would discourage land banking and could significantly boost housing supply.

• It’s Fair: LVT taxes unearned wealth. It falls most heavily on those who own the most valuable land, making it inherently progressive.

The Downside (The Trade-offs):

• Valuation: The biggest hurdle is practical: how to separate the value of the land from the building sitting on it. While opponents say this is impossible, proponents argue modern data analytics and computer-assisted appraisals make this entirely feasible.

• Transitional Shock: Its introduction would create winners and losers. Landowners would see the value of their holdings fall overnight, as the new tax liability would be instantly priced in. This would be a major shock to the system.

• The "Asset-Rich, Cash-Poor" Problem: What about the pensioner who bought their house in the 1970s and now lives in a high-value area on a modest income? It would be unfair to force them out with a huge tax bill. This is a serious concern that requires a specific solution (more on that below).

What Taxes Could it Replace?

LVT should not be an additional tax. Its power lies in its ability to simplify the system by replacing our most damaging and hated taxes. An ambitious LVT could replace:

• Council Tax: A confusing and regressive property tax based on outdated 1991 valuations.

• Business Rates: A widely despised tax that penalises businesses for occupying physical property and improving it.

• Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT): A transactional tax that gums up the housing market, discourages moving, and makes it harder for people to downsize or relocate for work.

• Inheritance Tax on Property: A complex tax that often forces the sale of family homes and farms. A predictable annual LVT is a much fairer way for property wealth to contribute to public funds.

Replacing these with a single, transparent tax based on land value would represent a colossal simplification of the UK tax code.

A Practical Path Forward

A "big bang" introduction is a non-starter. It would be politically and economically impossible. A sensible, incremental rollout over a decade or more is the only viable path.

• Step 1: The Great Valuation. The first, multi-year step would be a comprehensive national project to create a public, transparent register of the unimproved value of every single land plot in the UK. This is a huge but not insurmountable data project.

• Step 2: Start with Business. The first tax to go should be non-domestic business rates. This would be a huge boost to high street businesses and could be tested on commercial land first. It would allow the valuation models to be refined and the economic effects to be studied.

• Step 3: Abolish Stamp Duty & Phase in for Residential. Once the system is proven, abolish SDLT. At the same time, begin phasing in LVT for residential properties at a very low rate, while simultaneously reducing Council Tax. Over 5-10 years, the LVT rate would slowly rise as the Council Tax is phased out completely.

• Step 4: Solve the Pensioner Problem. The solution to the "asset-rich, cash-poor" issue is simple: deferral. Homeowners below a certain income threshold would have the right to defer payment. The LVT bill would accrue as a debt against the property, only payable when it is next sold or upon the owner's death. No one would ever be forced to sell their home to pay the tax.

Conclusion: The Best House on a Bad Street

No tax is popular. But some are far more economically destructive than others. While a general wealth tax is a recipe for capital flight and administrative chaos, a Land Value Tax stands apart.

It is a tax on unearned wealth that cannot flee. It encourages development, discourages speculation, and allows us to scrap a host of deeply unpopular and inefficient existing taxes. The practical and political hurdles are significant, but they are not insurmountable. If we are serious about taxing wealth in a way that is fair, progressive, and pro-growth, the Land Value Tax is, at the very least, the least bad option we have. It’s an idea whose time is long overdue for serious consideration.

Subscribe now

However, to make this newsletter more tangible, I'm going to report on a portion of my portfolio that I run actively. This is often known as a "satellite" portfolio. It's the smaller, actively managed part of a "core-satellite" strategy, where the "core" is built on low-cost passive funds. The goal of the satellite is to generate higher returns.

Will I outperform a passive benchmark? Probably not, but for fun and reader entertainment, I’m willing to give it a go. Fundamentally, this is an experiment to pressure-test a core belief: that by stepping away from the herd, a thoughtful individual investor can still carve out an edge. My focus will be on generating absolute returns over the long term.

A proper experiment needs a control group. So, when I ask if I can outperform a passive benchmark, I need to be specific about which one.

A simple UK index like the FTSE All-Share isn’t a fair comparison, as this portfolio has global holdings. A broad global index like the MSCI World isn’t right either, as its tiny UK allocation wouldn’t properly test my UK-focused stock picks.

The benchmark to beat, therefore, will be the Vanguard LifeStrategy® 80% Equity Fund (Accumulation).

While no benchmark is perfect, this one is an excellent fit for three key reasons:

1. It’s multi-asset. With an 80% allocation to stocks and 20% to bonds, it reflects the fact that this portfolio also holds bonds and cash for stability.

2. It has a UK home bias. Like this portfolio, the LifeStrategy fund is globally diversified but retains a significant allocation to the UK. This means the experiment is a fairer test of UK stock selection, not just a bet on the UK market itself.

3. It’s a sensible default. For many UK investors, this fund is a simple, set-and-forget option. Beating it would mean this active approach has added genuine value.

The challenge is to see if a concentrated portfolio of my best ideas can outperform this simple, low-cost, and diversified passive option.

The experiment also needs a clear framework to operate within. These are the rules for this portfolio:

1. Long only. I'll only buy things. No shorting, no derivatives. This isn't a hedge fund.

2. Simple securities. Investment Trusts, REITs, ETFs, and individual stocks. Things anyone with a basic brokerage account can buy.

3. Concentrated. Around 15-20 holdings. If you're going to be active, your decisions have to matter. A portfolio of 100 stocks is just an expensive index fund. However, it's important to state that this concentration, while necessary for active returns, also increases risk. The performance of a single company will have a much greater impact on the overall portfolio.

4. Mostly UK-listed. As a practical matter, it's hard to follow many different markets well. For direct stock picking, the focus will be on the UK. My preferred way to gain overseas diversification will be through UK-listed Investment Trusts and ETFs. This approach reduces complexity and the drag from foreign exchange fees.

5. Tax-free account. All trades will happen inside a SIPP. This removes tax as a variable, so we're only measuring investment skill (or lack thereof).

6. Long time horizon. The money isn't needed for at least ten years. This is perhaps the most important rule. It's the biggest structural advantage an individual has over a professional manager. We can afford to be patient.

7. Style Agnostic. Not aiming to be a growth, value, or income investor. Only interested in total return.

I’ve started building the portfolio this past week, with an official start date of 1st July 2025. Here are the top ten holdings and their starting weights:

• Smithson Investment Trust (SSON): 11.2%

• Pollen Street Group (POLN): 9.5%

• Monks Investment Trust (MNKS): 9.5%

• iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF (TP05): 9.0%

• Oakley Capital Investments (OCI): 6.3%

• iShares UK Gilts 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IGLS): 6.3%

• Conduit Holdings (CRE): 5.5%

• XP Power (XPP): 5.5%

• RM plc (RM.): 4.6%

• Cake Box Holdings plc (CBOX): 4.4%

The remaining ~28% is split between several smaller positions and cash.

There is a thesis behind every one of these names. Over the coming weeks and months, I'll write about them. I'll explain what they do and why they've earned a place in the portfolio. The goal is to show the reasoning, not just the results.

On that note, I won't be reporting on performance frequently. To do so would be to fall into the trap of short-termism. The stock market is a noisy place day-to-day, and obsessing over weekly or even monthly fluctuations is a recipe for bad decisions.

I will report on performance quarterly. The first report card, covering the quarter ending September 30th, will be published in early October. Until then, the focus will be on the "why."

Until next time,

Happy investing.

Subscribe now

Disclaimer: The content of this post is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice. Please do your own research and consult the full disclaimer on the 'About' page.

With taxes widely expected to rise rather than fall, savvy investors are rightly exploring tax-efficient strategies. The foundational advice always holds true: maximising contributions to your ISA and pension (SIPP) should be the first port of call.

But once you’ve maxed out those allowances for the 2025/26 tax year, what's next? For investors with a higher risk appetite, the world of venture capital offers a powerful, government-endorsed route to exceptional tax efficiency via the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS). This raises a crucial question for any prudent investor: are these schemes simply a case of the 'tax tail wagging the investment dog', or do they represent a genuinely compelling asset class?

These government-backed schemes are not just tax wrappers; they are a vital engine for the UK economy, having channelled over £34 billion into some 59,000 businesses since their inception. These notes aim to demystify the schemes, explore the potential risks and rewards, and provide a framework to help you begin your own research.

Subscribe now

Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS)

Introduction and Background

Launched in 2012, SEIS is designed to boost investment in the riskiest stage of a company's life. It acknowledges the high risk of investing in new ventures and offers the most generous tax reliefs available to incentivise backing them.

Tax Benefits for Investors

SEIS provides a significant set of tax reliefs for individuals who subscribe for new shares in a qualifying company:

• 50% Income Tax Relief: Claim relief at 50% on the cost of your investment, up to a maximum annual investment of £200,000. This can be carried back to reduce your tax liability for the preceding tax year.

  • Example: An investment of £50,000 could generate an income tax reduction of £25,000.

• Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Exemption: Any gain on the sale of SEIS shares is completely exempt from CGT, provided the shares have been held for at least three years and you received income tax relief.

• Capital Gains Reinvestment Relief: You can exempt 50% of a capital gain realised from any asset by reinvesting it into qualifying SEIS shares. This is a unique and powerful feature of SEIS that is not available under the EIS.

• Inheritance Tax (IHT) Relief: After being held for two years, SEIS shares typically qualify for Business Property Relief (BPR), making them 100% exempt from IHT.

• Loss Relief: If your SEIS shares are sold at a loss, you can offset that loss (less the initial income tax relief received) against your tax bill. This allowable loss can be offset against either your income tax for the year of the loss (or the preceding year) or your capital gains tax bill.

  • Example: A higher-rate (45%) taxpayer invests £10,000 and the company fails.

    • Initial tax relief was £5,000 (50% of £10,000).

    • The remaining loss is £5,000.

    • Loss relief is calculated as £5,000 × 45% = £2,250.

    • The total relief is £5,000 + £2,250 = £7,250.

    • The net cost of the failed investment is only £2,750.

Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS)

Introduction and Background

Established in 1994, EIS is the elder sibling of SEIS. It is designed to help more established, yet still small and unquoted, companies raise capital for growth. While the risks are still significant, the companies are typically more developed than those qualifying for SEIS, and the tax reliefs reflect this.

Tax Benefits for Investors

• 30% Income Tax Relief: Claim relief at 30% on your investment. The maximum annual investment is £1 million (or £2 million if at least £1 million is invested in Knowledge-Intensive Companies).

  • Example: An investment of £100,000 could generate an income tax reduction of £30,000.

• Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Deferral Relief: You can defer a capital gain made on the disposal of any asset by reinvesting that gain into qualifying EIS shares. The deferred gain becomes payable only when the EIS shares are sold.

• Capital Gains Tax (CGT) Exemption: As with SEIS, any gain on the sale of EIS shares is exempt from CGT, provided the shares are held for at least three years and income tax relief was received.

• Inheritance Tax (IHT) Relief: EIS shares qualify for BPR after a two-year holding period, making them 100% exempt from IHT.

• Loss Relief: Similar to SEIS, if the shares are sold at a loss, the net loss can be offset against your income or capital gains.

A Note on Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs)

Launched in 1995, VCTs offer a different approach. A VCT is itself a publicly listed company, quoted on the London Stock Exchange. It raises money from investors and then uses that capital to invest in a diversified portfolio of small, unquoted trading companies. Rather than investing directly in a start-up, you buy shares in the VCT.

The main benefits, which are only available when you subscribe for newly issued shares, include 30% income tax relief (requiring a five-year holding period) and tax-free dividends. Because they are listed, VCTs are generally easier to find and research on major investment platforms.

How a Company Qualifies: The Rules of the Game

While understanding the tax benefits is key for an investor, it's just as crucial to know the strict rules a company must follow to be eligible for these schemes. These rules define the investment universe and ensure the schemes support specific types of businesses.

SEIS Company Criteria

A company can raise up to £250,000 in total under SEIS. To be eligible, it must meet the following criteria at the time of the share issue:

• Trading for less than 3 years: The company must be less than 3 years old. A company that has not yet started trading can also qualify.

• Gross assets below £350,000: The company's (and any subsidiaries') total assets must be under this limit.

• Fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees: This caps the size of the team.

• Have a permanent establishment in the UK: A substantial part of the business must be carried out in the UK.

• Not trading on a recognised stock exchange: The company must be private with no plans to become a public company at the time of the share issue.

• Must be an independent entity: The company cannot control another company (unless it's a qualifying subsidiary) and cannot have been controlled by another company since its incorporation.

• Never received investment from a VCT or EIS: SEIS is for companies at the very earliest stage, before they have received other forms of venture capital.

EIS Company Criteria

A company can raise up to £5 million each year under EIS, with a lifetime total of £12 million. To qualify, it must meet the following criteria:

• Trading for less than 7 years: The company must receive its first EIS investment within 7 years of its first commercial sale (this is extended for KICs, see below).

• Gross assets below £15m before investment, and £16m immediately after: This applies to the company and its group.

• Fewer than 250 full-time equivalent employees: Allowing for more established businesses than SEIS.

• Must meet the UK presence, stock exchange, and independence rules similar to those for SEIS.

A Note on Knowledge-Intensive Companies (KICs)

HMRC gives special status to companies focused on research, development, and innovation. As mentioned earlier, this provides a higher investment allowance for investors, and these companies also benefit from expanded qualifying criteria:

• They can receive investment up to 10 years from their first commercial sale.

• They can have up to 500 full-time employees.

• They can raise up to £10m per year, with a lifetime limit of £20m.

To qualify, a KIC must meet stringent conditions related to its operating costs, the number of skilled employees involved in R&D, or its work on creating intellectual property. This designation allows investors to support and gain tax relief on more mature, innovation-led businesses.

The Most Important Rule: The Risk-to-Capital Condition

On top of the technical rules, HMRC applies a crucial "gateway" test: the Risk-to-Capital Condition. Introduced in 2018, this test ensures the schemes are used as intended—to channel capital into genuine, high-growth companies, not low-risk structures where tax relief is the main benefit. It effectively ended the era of "asset-backed" investments that focused on capital preservation.

The test has two parts, both of which must be met:

1. The company must have objectives to grow and develop. The investment must be a catalyst for this growth, evidenced by plans to increase revenue, customers, or employees, not simply to maintain the status quo.

2. The investment must carry a significant risk of capital loss. The risk of loss must be greater than the net return an investor is likely to receive (after considering tax reliefs). Any structure that largely protects an investor's capital, such as using secured assets, will fail this test.

The takeaway for investors is twofold. The rule guarantees every investment is genuinely high-risk. And it means your fund manager’s ability to structure a compliant deal is as vital as their ability to pick a winner. A manager’s failure here can result in the complete loss of tax relief, making their expertise in this area essential.

How Can I Invest in SEIS and EIS?

While all investors in these schemes must be UK taxpayers, the routes to investment can vary significantly. The path you choose will depend on your appetite for risk, desire for diversification, and how hands-on you want to be.

Route 1: The Managed 'Fund' or Portfolio

This is the most common way to invest, where you commit capital to an investment manager who builds a diversified portfolio of qualifying companies on your behalf.

Here's a crucial technical point you must grasp: an EIS 'fund' isn't a fund in the traditional sense (like a unit trust). For you to get the tax relief, HMRC rules state that you must own the shares in the underlying startups directly. Think of it this way: the fund manager acts as your expert shopper, using their expertise to pick a portfolio of companies for you, but the shares go directly into your basket, not theirs. Legally, it's a discretionary managed portfolio.

You can typically access these managed funds in two ways:

• Through a financial adviser or wealth manager, who can conduct due diligence and recommend a fund that suits your specific financial situation and risk profile.

• Directly with an EIS investment manager, which is a path more suited to experienced investors who are comfortable making their own decisions without professional advice.

The Legal Structure of a Managed 'Fund'

To get a complete picture of this route, it's essential to understand the other key actors in the structure:

• The Fund Manager: An FCA-authorised firm that makes the investment decisions on your behalf, as per a discretionary management agreement. They are responsible for deal sourcing, due diligence, portfolio construction, and managing the investments through to exit.

• The Custodian: A separate, FCA-regulated firm appointed by the manager to safeguard your assets. They hold your subscription money in a segregated client account and handle the administration of the shares.

• The Nominee: Typically a non-trading subsidiary of the custodian that holds the legal title to the shares. This is done on behalf of the beneficial owner—you.

In practice, your relationship is almost exclusively with the fund manager. The custodian and nominee operate in the background, executing instructions. This is why all communications, reports, and tax certificates are typically issued by the fund manager. Understanding this operational plumbing provides a much clearer insight into how your investment is managed and safeguarded.

Route 2: Direct Single-Company Investment

This is the highest-risk, highest-potential-reward route, where you invest directly into a single start-up. This approach offers no diversification but gives you a more direct connection to the business you're backing. This route is typically accessed via crowdfunding platforms, angel investing, or your personal network.

Route 3: The 'Portfolio Service' (Pick-and-Choose)

A less common, hybrid option is the 'portfolio service'. Here, an investment manager pre-vets a range of qualifying companies and presents them to investors, who can then build their own portfolio from this curated list.

A Note on Advanced Subscription Agreements (ASAs)

While many investments are made in a "priced round" where you receive shares immediately, it's good to be aware of an alternative instrument: the Advanced Subscription Agreement (ASA).

An ASA is a contract where you invest money now in exchange for shares to be issued at a later date, typically when the company completes its next formal funding round. This allows a company to secure funds quickly, and in return for taking on that early risk, investors are usually rewarded by receiving their shares at a discount.

For the purposes of this article, the most important point is this: to be eligible for tax relief, an ASA must be structured as an investment in equity (not a loan) and must comply with strict HMRC rules. Ensuring the agreement is compliant is a critical task for any fund manager, as an error can lead to a complete loss of the expected tax benefits for their investors.

A Crucial Factor: How Managers Find Investments ('Deal Flow')

When you invest in public companies on the stock market, finding potential investments is relatively easy. Thousands of companies are listed, each with a daily share price, published results, and coverage from professional analysts. The skill for a public equity manager is picking the winners from a vast, visible universe.

Investing in EIS-qualifying companies is completely different. There is no stock market for these private businesses, and dedicated analyst coverage is scarce. This means a huge part of the challenge—and a manager's value—is their ability to generate a high-quality pipeline of investment opportunities, known as 'deal flow'.

So, how do managers source these hidden gems? They rely heavily on extensive, curated networks built over many years.

Typical Sources of Deal Flow

• Universities and Academia: Managers build deep relationships with the technology transfer offices of top universities to find commercially promising ideas and spin-outs emerging from research labs.

• Industry Experts: They cultivate networks of senior executives and experienced professionals who can flag the most exciting new talent and disruptive technologies within their specific sectors.

• Professional Services Network: Accountants, lawyers, and corporate financiers are often the first to work with new businesses seeking funding. They become a key source of referrals for fund managers.

• Angel Investors and Serial Entrepreneurs: Successful entrepreneurs who have built and sold businesses (think of the personalities on TV's Dragons' Den) are constantly looking for the next big thing. Fund managers often co-invest with these 'business angels', sharing opportunities and reducing risk.

• Direct Approaches and Platforms: As the market matures, it is increasingly common for companies to approach fund managers directly or to raise capital on crowdfunding and investment platforms, adding another channel for sourcing deals.

Generating deal flow is only the first step. A good EIS manager may review hundreds of companies each year but, following a rigorous due diligence process, ultimately invest in only a handful. Their ability to not only find but also filter these opportunities is fundamental to their role. This intensive, network-driven sourcing and filtering process is one of the primary justifications for the fee structures of SEIS and EIS funds, which differ significantly from their public market counterparts.

Understanding SEIS & EIS Fund Fees

Before you invest, it's crucial to understand one of the biggest factors affecting your potential returns: fees. There is no single, standard fee structure in the industry, but all charges will ultimately impact your net return. All funds have fees, which can be broken down into two main types.

Direct Fees: What You Pay

These are charges you, the investor, pay directly to the fund manager. They are the most transparent fees and reduce the amount of your capital that gets invested.

• Initial Fee: A one-off charge when you invest, often around 1-5%.

• Annual Management Charge (AMC): An ongoing fee for managing the fund. A key point to watch is that many funds collect several years of their AMC upfront. For example, if a fund takes a 5% upfront fee to cover costs, only 95% of your capital is actually invested and qualifies for tax relief.

• Performance Fee: This is how managers are rewarded for successful exits. It's designed to align their interests with yours. A typical structure is a 20% fee on all profits after you have received your initial investment back (known as the "hurdle").

Indirect Fees: What the Company Pays

These fees are charged by the fund manager to the start-ups that receive the investment. This model allows a fund to claim it has 'no fees for the investor' and ensures 100% of your capital is deployed, maximising your tax relief.

However, there is no such thing as a free lunch. The fees still exist; they just reduce the cash the start-up has for growth. Some argue that the very best start-ups, which have their pick of investors, may refuse to accept funding from firms that charge them fees. This could potentially limit the fund's access to top-tier opportunities.

Your Key Takeaway on Fees

Whether fees are direct or indirect, they impact your final return. A fund advertising '100% deployment' isn't free; it's simply charging the portfolio companies instead of you. Many funds use a hybrid model, charging both the investor and the company.

The most important step is to read the Information Memorandum or Offer Document for any fund you consider. You must understand the total fee load—who pays, what they pay, and when—to make a fair comparison between different fund managers.

How to Claim Your Tax Relief

Claiming your tax relief is not an automatic process; it is contingent upon the company you have invested in following a strict procedure with HMRC. Understanding this timeline is key to managing your expectations.

Step 1 (Optional but Recommended): Advance Assurance Before seeking funds, a company usually applies for 'Advance Assurance' (AA) from HMRC. This is effectively a provisional letter from HMRC stating that a company's investment plan appears to meet the scheme's rules. While not a final guarantee, most professional investors and funds will only invest in companies that have secured AA.

Step 2: The Company Applies for Compliance After you invest, the company must meet certain conditions before it can apply to HMRC for the compliance certificates that enable you to claim tax relief. The rules differ slightly for SEIS and EIS.

• For an SEIS investment: The company must submit a compliance statement (Form SEIS1) after it has met one of the following conditions:

  • It has been carrying on its trade for at least four months.

  • OR it has spent at least 70% of the money raised from the share issue.

• For an EIS investment: The company must submit a compliance statement (Form EIS1) after it has been carrying on its trade for at least four months.

Once the relevant conditions are met, the company sends the form to HMRC for approval.

Step 3: Receiving Your Tax Certificate (SEIS3 or EIS3) Once HMRC approves the company's submission, the company can issue your tax certificate: a SEIS3 form for a SEIS investment or an EIS3 for an EIS investment. This certificate is the crucial, official document you need to claim tax relief. You cannot claim any relief without it.

Step 4: Making Your Claim With your SEIS3 or EIS3 certificate in hand, you can now claim the relief. You do this by completing the "Additional information" (SA101) pages of your Self Assessment tax return. You will need to enter the details from your certificate, including the name of the company, the amount of your subscription, and the date of issue.

You have a time limit for claiming your relief, which is generally within five years from the 31st of January following the tax year of the investment. Remember, you also have the option to 'carry back' the income tax relief to the preceding tax year, which can be particularly useful if you had a higher tax liability in that year.

Managing Expectations on Timing

A common point of confusion for new investors is the timing of these certificates. They are not issued immediately upon investment.

Given the conditions required before a company can apply for compliance (such as the four-month trading period for EIS), there is always a delay. For investors in a managed fund, this delay is often amplified. A fund manager may take 12 to 24 months to fully invest your committed capital across a portfolio. This means you should expect to receive your tax certificates in stages on a deal-by-deal basis over this entire period, not as a single package upfront.

It is worth noting one important exception to this staggered timeline: Approved Knowledge-Intensive (KI) Funds. For these specific funds, the investment date for tax purposes is the date the fund closes, not the date of each underlying investment. This allows the fund manager to issue a single EIS3 certificate for your entire investment shortly after the fund's closing date, enabling you to claim your full tax relief in one go rather than waiting for certificates to arrive in stages.

A Due Diligence Framework for Selecting a Fund Manager

Choosing the right fund manager is one of the most critical decisions in SEIS/EIS investing. To help you look beyond the marketing materials and make an informed decision, the following questions provide a structured starting point for your own due diligence. This is not an exhaustive list, but it covers the foundational areas you should explore to build a clear picture of a manager's strategy, expertise, and alignment with your goals.

The Manager and Team

• Is the fund manager authorised and regulated by the FCA? What is their FCA number?

• Who are the key individuals on the investment team? What is their specific expertise and track record of investing in early-stage companies?

• How long has the core team been working together? Have there been any recent key departures that could signal instability?

• What is the firm's total Assets Under Management (AUM) and how long have they been managing EIS/SEIS portfolios specifically?

The Strategy and Philosophy

• What is the fund's specific investment thesis? Are they a generalist or do they specialise in certain sectors (e.g., Deep Tech, SaaS, Life Sciences)? Does this align with your own interests?

• How do they source their investment opportunities (deal flow)? Do they have proprietary networks (e.g., relationships with universities, industry experts) or do they rely on public platforms?

• What is their due diligence process for selecting companies? Ask for the ratio of deals they review versus how many they actually invest in.

• How many companies will be in your portfolio for the amount you invest? What is the target level of diversification?

Operations and Alignment

• What is the full fee structure? Request a clear, itemised breakdown of all initial, annual, administrative, and performance fees. Understand the total potential drag on your returns.

• How is the performance fee calculated—is it on a whole-portfolio basis (more investor-aligned) or a deal-by-deal basis? What is the hurdle rate (e.g., 120% of capital returned) before the fee kicks in?

• What is the expected timeline for deploying your capital and for you to receive your EIS3/SEIS3 tax certificates?

• How frequently do they report on portfolio performance, and in what format (e.g., written reports, online portal, investor events)?

The Portfolio and Performance

• What is the fund's target return multiple (e.g., 2-3x net of fees)? What evidence, based on their track record or market data, supports this target?

• What is the manager's history of successful exits? What is the average holding period for both successful and failed investments?

• What level of support and expertise does the manager provide to their portfolio companies post-investment (the "More Than Money" approach)?

• Does the manager seek HMRC Advance Assurance for all potential investments before committing capital? This is a crucial risk-management step.

Conclusion

Navigating the world of SEIS and EIS requires a clear head and a rigorous approach. These are not mainstream investments; they are high-risk ventures into the engine room of the UK economy, backing the entrepreneurs and innovators of tomorrow. The tax reliefs are exceptionally generous precisely because the risk of failure is real and the capital is illiquid, often for many years.

The government has made its policy intent clear through the introduction of the Risk-to-Capital Condition: these schemes are designed to reward investors for taking genuine entrepreneurial risk, not for engaging in low-risk tax planning. This principle should be the investor's guiding star.

For the right investor—one who has first made appropriate use of their annual ISA and pension allowances, understands their risk tolerance, and commits to the rigorous due diligence required—the 'tax tail' ceases to wag the 'investment dog'. Instead, the schemes are revealed as a powerful tool for strategic financial planning, fully aligned with the potential for asymmetric, venture-style returns. The journey begins with thorough research and due diligence, not just into the schemes themselves, but into the founders and ventures at the heart of this dynamic and exciting market.

Share

Disclaimer

All investors must conduct their own thorough due diligence before making any investment. You should also consider seeking independent financial advice from an FCA-authorised professional. All content in this article is subject to the full disclaimer on the 'About' page.

This primer is designed to demystify the UK bond market. We'll start with the basics, explore the different types of bonds available, and then look at how you can apply this knowledge practically—including an exploration of fund types that make accessing this world straightforward.

Subscribe now

Part 1: The Foundations of Fixed Income

What is a Bond? The Core Concept as a Simple Loan

Before we dive into strategy, we need to grasp the fundamentals. At its heart, a bond is simple. Think of it as a loan. When you buy a bond, you are lending money to an issuer—which could be a government or a corporation.

In return for your loan, the issuer makes two key promises:

• To make regular interest payments, known as the coupon, over a set period.

• At the end of that period, on the maturity date, to repay your original loan amount, known as the par value or face value.

You, the investor, are the lender. The government or corporation is the borrower. This simple relationship forms the basis of the multi-trillion-pound global bond market. While you may hear terms like 'fixed income' (the overall asset class) or 'credit' (referring to corporate bonds), 'bond' is the simple term for the specific loan you are making.

Yield vs. Price: The Crucial Relationship

This is the most critical dynamic for any bond investor to understand. The coupon rate on a bond is fixed, but its price can and does fluctuate in the open market after it is issued. This price movement creates an inverse relationship between a bond's price and its yield.

Think of it like a seesaw: when the price of a bond goes up, its yield goes down, and vice versa.

• Example: Imagine you buy a new bond for £100 with a 4% coupon. A year later, the Bank of England has raised interest rates, and new, similar bonds are now being issued with a 6% coupon. Your 4% bond is now less attractive. To entice someone to buy it, you’d have to sell it at a lower price (a discount) to make its overall return competitive with the new 6% bonds. Conversely, if interest rates fall to 2%, your 4% bond becomes highly attractive, and its price will rise (it will trade at a premium).

This is why the most comprehensive measure of a bond's total return is its Yield to Maturity (YTM), which accounts for its current price, all remaining coupon payments, and the final repayment of principal.

Two Concepts Every Bond Investor Must Know: Duration and Real Yield

To properly understand risk and return, there are two more crucial terms to grasp.

• Duration: This is a measure of a bond's sensitivity to interest rate changes. It's measured in years, but it's easier to think of it as a sensitivity score: the higher the duration, the more a bond's price will drop when interest rates rise. A bond or fund with a duration of 7 will be roughly twice as sensitive to rate changes as one with a duration of 3.5. It is the single most important metric for gauging interest rate risk.

• Real Yield: The nominal yield is the headline rate, but what truly matters is the real yield—the yield after subtracting inflation. If your bond yields 5% but inflation is running at 3%, your real yield is only 2%. In today's environment, focusing on real yields is critical to ensure your income is actually increasing your purchasing power.

Part 2: The Key Risks of Bond Investing

While bonds are generally less volatile than equities, they are not risk-free. Understanding these risks is crucial for making informed decisions.

• Interest Rate Risk: This is the risk that rising interest rates will cause the value of your existing bonds to fall. As we saw with the seesaw example, if new bonds are issued with higher coupons, your older, lower-coupon bond becomes less attractive and its market price will drop. Longer-maturity bonds are most sensitive, and duration is the key metric to watch here.

• Inflation Risk: This is the risk that inflation will rise faster than your bond's coupon, eroding the purchasing power of your income. A 4% yield is great when inflation is 2%, but not when it's 6%. This is a major risk for all fixed-coupon bonds.

• Credit (or Default) Risk: This is the risk that the issuer will fail to make its interest payments or repay your principal. For UK government bonds, this risk is negligible. For corporate bonds, it varies hugely, from low for corporate giants to very high for smaller, more indebted "junk" bond issuers.

• Liquidity Risk: This is the risk of not being able to sell your bond quickly at a fair price. While popular government bonds are very liquid, this is a significant issue in the corporate bond market, where many bonds trade infrequently, especially in the smaller sizes typical for retail investors.

• Reinvestment Risk: This is the risk that when your bond matures, you'll have to reinvest your capital at a lower interest rate, reducing your future income. This is most relevant for investors who rely on a steady income stream and for those holding shorter-term bonds in a falling-rate environment.

• Call Risk (or Prepayment Risk): Some bonds are "callable," meaning the issuer can choose to repay them early. They typically do this if interest rates have fallen, allowing them to borrow again more cheaply. This is bad for the investor, who is forced to take their money back and reinvest it at the new, lower rates.

Part 3: The UK Bond Universe

For a UK-based investor, the bond market can be broken down into two key areas.

1. UK Government Bonds (Gilts): The Lowest-Risk Benchmark

Gilts are bonds issued by the UK government to fund its spending. They are considered the benchmark for UK credit because the UK government is considered to have virtually no risk of default on debt issued in its own currency (sterling). For this reason, their credit risk is considered negligible. However, this does not make them risk-free, as they are still exposed to significant interest rate risk and inflation risk.

There are two main types of gilt:

• Conventional Gilts: Pay a fixed coupon twice a year and repay the principal at maturity. They are the backbone of the UK bond market.

• Index-Linked Gilts: Both the coupon payments and the final principal are adjusted in line with an official measure of UK inflation (historically the Retail Price Index, or RPI). This makes them popular during inflationary periods, but they typically offer a lower starting yield to reflect this protection.

2. Sterling Corporate Bonds: The Engine of Corporate Finance

These are bonds issued by UK companies to raise capital. They always offer higher yields than gilts to compensate investors for taking on more risk. The market is broadly split by credit quality:

• Investment-Grade Corporate Bonds: Issued by large, stable UK companies (think FTSE 100 giants). They offer a modest yield premium over gilts and are a core holding for many income investors.

• High-Yield Corporate Bonds (or "Junk" Bonds): Issued by smaller or more indebted companies. The risk of default is significantly higher, but so are the potential returns. This is a specialist area requiring careful research.

It's worth noting that the corporate bond market is incredibly diverse. Beyond the standard fixed-coupon bonds, investors can also find Floating Rate Notes (FRNs), where the coupon payment adjusts with interest rates, and more complex hybrid securities like Preference Shares and Convertible Bonds. We may explore these more specialist areas in a future article.

Part 4: The Practical Guide for UK Investors

The Core Benefits for a UK Investor's Portfolio

• Structurally Safer than Equities: Due to their seniority in a company's capital structure, bonds must be repaid before shareholders in the event of bankruptcy.

• Contractual Income Stream: Coupon payments are a contractual obligation, unlike discretionary equity dividends which can be cut at any time.

• Portfolio Diversification: Government bonds (Gilts) have historically provided strong diversification against equities. However, this relationship can change. Corporate bonds often fall in value for the same reasons shares do (like a bad economy), meaning they don't always provide the diversification you might expect.

• Significant Tax Advantages: A huge advantage for UK investors is that any capital gain from selling Gilts is exempt from Capital Gains Tax (CGT). Furthermore, most sterling corporate bonds are Qualifying Corporate Bonds (QCBs), meaning any capital gain you make on them is also completely exempt from CGT. Crucially, the income (coupon) from these bonds is still subject to Income Tax unless they are held in a tax-efficient wrapper like an ISA or SIPP.

Sourcing and Buying Individual Bonds: The Reality for Retail Investors

While it's possible to buy individual bonds via platforms like the LSE's Order Book for Retail Bonds (ORB), this represents only a tiny fraction of the market. The reality is that most high-quality corporate bonds are issued in large denominations (often £100,000 or more) to place them out of reach for most individuals. Liquidity can also be very low.

The Fund Route: A Gateway to Diversification

This is why, for the vast majority of retail investors, a fund-based approach is not just more practical, it's often the only viable route. It provides instant diversification, professional management, and easy access, even with a small amount of capital.

Illustrative Examples: A Spectrum of Bond Funds and ETFs

Bond funds and ETFs cater to a wide range of risk appetites. To illustrate this, here are a few examples of fund types, moving from lower-risk strategies to those targeting higher income.

• For Capital Preservation & Cash-Like Returns (e.g., a Sterling Money Market Fund): These funds aim to preserve capital by investing in cash and very short-term debt. They are designed to be a low-volatility option for cash holdings, seeking a higher income than a typical savings account.

• For Core Diversification (e.g., a Global Aggregate Bond ETF): These passive exchange-traded funds (ETFs) offer broad, low-cost diversification. They track a global index of thousands of investment-grade government and corporate bonds, making them a common core holding.

• For Higher Income (Illustrative Investment Trusts): For investors willing to take on more credit and complexity risk, specialist investment trusts offer access to professionally managed portfolios of higher-yielding assets. The following are examples to illustrate different strategies in this space:

  • Invesco Bond Income Plus (BIPS): Primarily invests in higher-yielding European corporate bonds and the subordinated debt of financial institutions.

  • CQS New City High Yield Fund (NCYF): Its strategy is anchored in UK high-yield bonds, supplemented with other income-producing assets like preference shares.

  • TwentyFour Income Fund (TFIF): Invests in a specialist area: European Asset-Backed Securities (ABS), which are bonds backed by pools of financial assets like mortgages or car loans.

Note: The yields on these funds are variable and not guaranteed. Before investing, always check the fund's official factsheet or Key Information Document (KID) for the most up-to-date information on its yield, duration, holdings, and risk profile.

The Power of ISAs and SIPPs

The most effective way for most people to invest is through a tax-efficient wrapper. If you hold bonds or bond funds within a Stocks and Shares ISA or a SIPP, all income and capital gains are completely free of UK tax.

Part 5: How Professionals Analyse Bonds (And Why Funds Are Useful)

To truly understand the value a fund manager provides, it's helpful to see the analysis they perform.

• Credit Spread: This is the difference in yield between a corporate bond and a government bond (a Gilt) with a similar maturity. It is the extra yield you receive as compensation for taking on credit risk. Professionals focus intensely on whether spreads are "widening" (risk increasing) or "tightening" (risk decreasing) to judge value.

• Credit Ratings: The starting point is the rating agencies: Moody's, S&P, and Fitch. They assign a rating from AAA (highest quality) down to D (in default). Bonds rated BBB- or higher are "Investment Grade".

• Seniority and Security: This refers to the bondholder's place in the queue if a company goes bankrupt. Senior bondholders must be legally repaid before subordinated bondholders and equity holders. However, this is no guarantee of getting all your money back.

• The Prospectus and Covenants: Every bond is issued with a prospectus outlining its terms, including covenants—rules the issuer must abide by. These legal documents are long, complex, and impractical for a retail investor to analyse.

This rigorous due diligence is a key benefit of using a professional fund manager.

Part 6: Conclusion and Actionable Next Steps

By understanding the journey from a simple loan to the interplay of credit spreads and duration, you equip yourself with a powerful new lens through which to view the market. This knowledge is about more than just income; it's about understanding a company's financial health at a deeper level.

To continue your journey, consider these steps:

1. Do Your Fund Homework: When looking at a bond fund or trust, always read the factsheet and Key Information Document. Pay close attention to its objective, duration, credit quality, and top holdings.

2. Link Debt to Equity: Use bond market signals as an equity investor. If a company's credit spread is widening sharply, it's a red flag about its financial health that shareholders should not ignore.

3. See the Big Picture: Consider how fixed income fits your personal risk tolerance and long-term goals. If you are unsure, it is always best to seek independent financial advice.

Share

Disclaimer

The fund types mentioned are for illustrative purposes only and are not recommendations. Yields are variable, not guaranteed, and past performance is not an indicator of future results. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should conduct their own thorough due diligence and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Please also refer to the full disclaimer available on the 'About' page, which applies to all content published here.

Subscribe now

Investment Trusts and Today's Pervasive Discounts

An investment trust is a publicly listed company that invests in a diversified portfolio of assets (equities, bonds, property, infrastructure, etc.), managed by a professional fund manager. Its shares trade on a stock exchange, where their price can diverge from the trust's Net Asset Value (NAV) per share. The total NAV represents the entire value of the trust's investments less its liabilities; this total, divided by the number of shares in issue, gives the NAV per share. When the share price is below the NAV per share, the trust's shares are said to trade at a discount. This theoretically allows investors to buy into the underlying assets for less than their market worth. Conversely, a premium means shares are more expensive than the underlying assets represented by the NAV per share.

In recent years, discounts in the UK investment trust sector have notably widened across various strategies. This has often been attributed to factors like rising interest rates, economic uncertainty, and sector-specific challenges. While such discounts can frustrate existing holders, they may present opportunities for new investors and sometimes act as a catalyst for corporate actions. If persistent discounts are not addressed through other measures, such as share buybacks, boards may be compelled to consider more definitive solutions, often following a formal strategic review which can include exploring a managed wind-down.

The Managed Wind-Down Explained

A managed wind-down can occur when a trust faces persistent wide discounts, performance issues, or a strategic shift. This approach is increasingly common on the London Stock Exchange, especially for sub-scale trusts. These trusts typically grapple with:

• Poor Liquidity: Low trading volumes hinder institutional investors and consolidating wealth managers from building or divesting positions without adverse price impact.

• Higher Relative Costs: Fixed operating costs (listing, director, audit fees) form a larger part of a smaller NAV, leading to higher Ongoing Charge Ratios (OCRs) and reduced cost-competitiveness.

• Lack of Investor Interest: Limited analyst coverage means smaller trusts can be overlooked, subduing share demand and widening discounts.

These factors frequently indicate that a trust is ripe for a strategic review. When challenges become entrenched, a wind-down becomes a viable path to return value to shareholders. The board ceases new investments, focusing on the orderly realisation of assets over a defined period. The board then uses the proceeds from these asset sales to distribute capital to shareholders, with the aim of reflecting the underlying asset value and thereby closing the discount to NAV.

A “Mental Model”: Wind-Downs as Buffett-esque "Workouts"

A managed wind-down fundamentally alters the investment. An ongoing investment trust resembles what Warren Buffett, during his Buffett Partnership era, termed a "General." In a wind-down, it transforms into a "Workout." These distinct categories, which we will explore in more detail later, carry different implications for investment analysis and expected returns. For now, understand that a "General's" value hinges on future earnings and manager skill, often moving with broader market tides, while a "Workout" derives its value primarily from the successful completion of a specific corporate event or process, largely independent of those broader market conditions.

The investment thesis shifts from future growth prospects to the asset realisation process and timeline. By selling assets and returning cash, a wind-down allows shareholders to realise the full value of their holdings. For trusts trading at a discount, this means realising a value closer to NAV, which is inherently higher than the pre-announcement market share price. This approach is characteristic of classic special situation investing. The returns are often driven by the "event" (the wind-down announcement and subsequent actions) rather than by broader market movements.

Key Factors and Inherent Risks Determining a Wind-Down's Success:

The potential success of such a wind-down hinges on several interconnected factors, each carrying inherent risks that investors must carefully evaluate. These are not "easy money" scenarios, and thorough due diligence is paramount:

• Initial Discount vs. Asset Valuation Uncertainty: A compelling discount may be offset if the underlying assets, especially illiquid ones (such as unlisted infrastructure or private equity), fail to achieve their stated NAV upon sale due to market conditions or inherent valuation complexities.

• Asset Liquidity and Execution Complexity: The ease of selling assets directly impacts the timeline and success, with execution risk heightened by illiquid holdings, complex disposals involving meticulous planning and stakeholder communication, potential regulatory hurdles, or unforeseen liabilities.

• Wind-Down Timeframe and Potential Delays: An estimated timeline for realisation can be significantly extended by difficulties in selling assets, prolonged regulatory approvals, or adverse market conditions, locking up capital, incurring opportunity costs, and potentially diminishing the investment's internal rate of return (IRR).

• Containment of Wind-Down Costs: Successful outcomes depend on managing the various costs of the wind-down (ongoing management, advisory, legal, and potential performance fees), as these directly erode the net proceeds available to shareholders.

• Board/Manager Credibility, Alignment, and Incentives: The experience of the board and manager is vital, but success also depends on their incentives being strongly aligned with maximising shareholder value swiftly and effectively throughout the realisation process, avoiding potential conflicts of interest.

The Potential for Uncorrelated Returns from "Workouts"

Despite these risks, special situations like managed wind-downs ("Workouts") offer returns potentially less correlated with the general stock market. While market sentiment can influence asset sale prices, the successful execution of the wind-down plan, navigating the risks outlined above, is the primary return driver.

This can be a valuable portfolio diversifier. During his Buffett Partnership days, Warren Buffett categorised his investments into distinct groups, each offering different risk and return profiles:

• "Generals": These typically involved securities identified as undervalued based on quantitative metrics, although qualitative aspects also played a role. Profitability from "Generals" depended on the market eventually recognizing this undervaluation or on improvements within the underlying business. These often formed a substantial part of the partnership's portfolio.

• "Workouts" (Special Situations): The financial outcome of these investments was primarily contingent upon specific, usually pre-announced, corporate actions—such as liquidations, mergers, or reorganisations—rather than general market movements. Managed wind-downs align closely with this category.

• "Controls": In these instances, the partnership acquired a controlling interest, or a stake sufficient to influence corporate policy. The objective was often to unlock value that the market had failed to recognize, and "Control" situations could evolve from "Generals" that remained undervalued for extended periods.

Allocating to "Workouts" can provide returns that behave differently from "Generals," potentially smoothing overall portfolio volatility and offering opportunities even in flat or declining markets. Their success is tied to specific corporate actions, not just macroeconomic trends, making them a strategic choice for investors looking to achieve particular portfolio 'fitness' objectives, such as enhanced diversification or capturing value independent of broad market sentiment.

Understanding these dynamics is one thing; seeing them in practice is another. Let's examine a few current examples of investment trusts undergoing managed wind-downs.

Abrdn European Logistics Income plc (ASLI): [SP: 59p, MC: £242m] (Q1 2025 IFRS NAV: 70.6p)

Strategy & Assets

ASLI is a closed-end fund owning 'mid-box' European logistics sites. Its portfolio is concentrated in Spain, Netherlands, France, and Germany, featuring high-quality tenants like Amazon, DHL, and Dachser.

Progression & Considerations (as of Q1 2025 Update)

The company is actively progressing with its orderly asset realisation strategy. In Q1 2025, ASLI returned €19.7 million (equivalent to 4.8c or 4.0p per share) to shareholders. Excluding this distribution, the IFRS NAV per share (ex-liquidation costs) rose 1.1% to 87.0c (72.7p). Including the distribution and a full provision for estimated liquidation costs, the IFRS NAV stood at 84.5c (70.6p). The like-for-like portfolio valuation (excluding recently sold Spanish assets) increased by 0.8% (€4.3 million) during the quarter.

Successful disposals at or above book value are encouraging signs: two Spanish assets (Barcelona, Coslada) were sold in January 2025 for €29.7 million, an 11.9% premium to their Q3 2024 valuations, with €17.7 million of the proceeds used for debt repayment. The sale of a warehouse in Oss, Netherlands, also completed for €15.7 million (in line with valuation), and €9.9 million of debt was repaid (transaction completed late Dec 2024, announced Jan 2025). Currently, ASLI is under offer for five assets (approximately 120,000 sqm), with contracts anticipated in the coming weeks, potentially enabling a further capital distribution by mid-Q3 2025. Three additional assets (c.90,000 sqm) are in detailed due diligence, and others are being marketed.

Key considerations for investors include the steady execution progress demonstrated in the Q1 update, with capital returned alongside an underlying NAV increase. Financially, the Loan to Value (LTV) ratio was a moderate 36.2% at the quarter-end, and the trust benefits from aggregate fixed debt facilities of €218 million at an attractive average all-in interest rate of 1.93%, with the earliest debt maturity in mid-2025, providing a stable financial footing. Operationally, leasing success continued, exemplified by a new 7-year lease at Getafe, Madrid, which reduced the void rate to 2.6%, and rent collection remained robust at 99.6% for Q1 2025. Upcoming catalysts include future disposals, particularly the five assets currently under offer, and the anticipated further capital return in Q3 2025.

Aquila European Renewables plc (AERS) [SP: 55p, MC: £210M] (As of March 31, 2025, NAV: 83.95 cents, note EUR/GBP)

Strategy & Assets

AERS invested in a diversified portfolio of renewable energy infrastructure projects, including wind, solar, and hydro assets, across Europe.

Progression & Considerations (as of March 31, 2025 / Q1 2025 Update)

The company appointed Rothschild & Co as its financial adviser to oversee the wind-down. As of March 31, 2025, the NAV was €317.4 million, or 83.95 cents per share. The Q1 2025 NAV total return was 0.1%, impacted by an increase in the portfolio discount rate to 7.5% (due to higher risk-free rates), although European power price curves remained stable during the period.

Regarding asset disposal, on May 1, 2025, AERS announced an agreement to sell its 18% interest in the Sagres Portuguese hydropower asset at a valuation in line with its December 31, 2024 NAV. The board is targeting the broader wind-down through two discrete portfolio disposals: a majority of the portfolio (for which non-binding Heads of Terms have been agreed and exclusivity granted to a preferred bidder, with an update anticipated by end of June 2025) and a portfolio of assets in a single geography (via a simultaneous focused sale process). The board's objective is to complete the sales process as quickly as possible, providing liquidity to shareholders at a premium to the prevailing share price by realising assets close to their reported NAV.

For investors, key factors influencing returns will be the prices achieved for the renewable energy assets, which can be affected by power price forecasts, discount rates, and regulatory environments. While the Sagres disposal aligned with NAV, the company cautions that uncertain renewable market conditions mean there is no guarantee of similar outcomes for the remaining portfolio, introducing execution certainty as a key consideration. The timeline for the two main portfolio disposals and subsequent capital returns will be critical to monitor.

Digital 9 Infrastructure plc (DGI9) [SP: 8.5p, MC: £72M] (As of December 31, 2024, NAV: 34.4p)

Strategy & Assets

DGI9 invested in a range of digital infrastructure assets, including subsea fibre (Aqua Comms, EMIC-1), data centres (Verne Global - now sold, SeaEdge UK1), terrestrial fibre, and wireless networks (Elio Networks), as well as a significant stake in Arqiva Group (UK broadcast and communications infrastructure).

Progression & Considerations (as of year-end 2024 & recent updates)

The company is navigating a complex managed wind-down, now overseen by new investment manager InfraRed Capital Partners (appointed October 2024, effective December 2024). The immediate focus is on asset disposals to repay its Revolving Credit Facility (RCF) and subsequently return capital to shareholders. The 2024 full-year results revealed a dramatic 56.7% decrease in NAV to £297.3 million (34.4p per share) as of December 31, 2024, mainly due to adjustments for the agreed sale considerations for Aqua Comms and EMIC-1 (prior to the final EMIC-1 completion) and a substantial revaluation of Arqiva.

The sale of Verne Global completed in March 2024, yielding £347m net proceeds used to pay down the RCF (a potential earn-out is still being valued). More recently, on May 29, 2025, DGI9 announced the completion of the EMIC-1 divestment for a final net consideration of US$43m (c. £32m). These proceeds, along with the release of $10m in construction commitments, will facilitate an imminent £40m repayment of the RCF. A binding sale agreement remains in place for Aqua Comms for $48m (c.£40m) net, though completion faces lengthy (c.12 months) regulatory approvals. The divestment process for SeaEdge UK1 is reported as "progressing well," with realisation expected "in the near term," while the sale process for Elio Networks is paused as InfraRed undertakes "value-add initiatives", extending its exit timeline. The Arqiva Group stake, considered the most significant remaining asset, is not expected to be sold before 2027. Clarity on key broadcasting contract renewals is essential, as these will significantly influence where Arqiva's valuation falls within a notably wide range of potential outcomes.

Following the EMIC-1 proceeds, the RCF balance will reduce to £13m. The original RCF (c.£53m balance prior to the EMIC-1 proceeds) was refinanced post-year-end 2024, with a new three-month term expiring June 16, 2025 (with extension options). The remaining £13m is anticipated to be repaid from further divestment proceeds and working capital surpluses.

Key investor considerations centre on several critical risks and progress markers. Execution risk is paramount: InfraRed’s ability to finalize remaining disposals like Aqua Comms and SeaEdge UK1 is crucial for full RCF repayment and subsequent capital returns. The Arqiva stake remains a major variable; its extended sale timeline (post-2027) and dependence on contract renewals contribute to significant uncertainty, a risk already highlighted by its substantial 2024 NAV write-down. Beyond Arqiva, valuation and governance issues persist, including an independent review of prior-year valuations (which could lead to historical adjustments), ongoing negotiations with the former manager (Triple Point) over termination, and DGI9's pursuit of reimbursement for a subsidiary's loss ($2.8M) due to external fraud.

Overall, DGI9 is a deep special situation. While its pronounced share price discount reflects these substantial risks, the recent EMIC-1 sale completion and significant RCF paydown are tangible positive steps. Further opportunities for value realization will largely depend on InfraRed's continued effective execution against their wind-down plan, a visual overview of which is provided in the timeline below.

Beyond these detailed examples, numerous other UK-listed investment trusts are also navigating managed wind-downs, including names such as Abrdn Diversified Income and Growth plc (ADIG), Ecofin U.S. Renewables Infrastructure Trust (RNEW), and GCP Asset Backed Income Fund Ltd (GABI), among others. For investors equipped with a thorough understanding of the mechanics and a diligent approach to assessing the inherent risks, these "Workout" scenarios may indeed offer a distinct pathway to unlocking value.

Share

Disclaimers

The information provided in this article regarding specific investment trusts is based on publicly available data as of late May 2025. The situations for these trusts can change rapidly, and the examples provided are not exhaustive. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should conduct their own thorough due diligence before making any investment decisions. Please also refer to the full disclaimer available on the 'About' page, which applies to all content published here.

To empower UK secondary school students with practical investing knowledge and real-world experience, fostering financial literacy and confidence. We aim to broaden pathways for diverse talent into the finance industry and cultivate a deeper understanding and engagement with UK listed investments.

Our Vision

A future where engaged young people from all backgrounds have the opportunity to become informed investors, contributing to a more inclusive and dynamic UK financial services sector, and fostering a robust domestic investment culture.

Subscribe now

The Opportunity: Nurturing Talent, Enhancing Diversity, and Strengthening UK Capital Markets

A sound understanding of investment principles is increasingly important in the modern economy. Yet, many young people who show early aptitude or interest lack practical exposure, especially those from backgrounds traditionally underrepresented in finance. Simultaneously, the finance industry seeks greater diversity, and there's a broader societal opportunity to deepen engagement with UK capital markets. Direct participation in the stock market by UK residents is less prevalent than in some other major economies.

This environment presents several related challenges we aim to address:

• Limited access to practical investment experience for young people.

• The perceived inaccessibility of finance careers for many.

• The imperative for greater diversity within the financial sector.

• The need to foster deeper engagement with UK capital markets.

The Sterling Investment Foundation seeks to tackle these interconnected challenges by:

• Providing a vital platform for interested students to gain hands-on skills.

• Demystifying investment careers and opening doors for diverse talent.

• Actively contributing to a more representative financial services industry.

• Fostering Engagement with UK Markets: By educating young people about UK listed companies, we aim to build a generation that understands and appreciates the role these businesses play in our economy and the opportunities they present for investment, indirectly supporting the vibrancy of UK capital markets.

Our charity aims to identify and nurture these interested students, providing them with an unparalleled opportunity to learn by doing, regardless of their background, and in doing so, to foster a greater connection with the UK's economic fabric.

Our Solution: School-Led Investment Clubs – Forging Future Investors

We propose the establishment of the Sterling Investment Foundation, dedicated to setting up and supporting "Future Investor Clubs" within UK secondary schools. These clubs will target students in Years 11, 12, and 13 who demonstrate keen interest. The core of our model is deep experiential learning:

• Real Money, Real Responsibility: The Foundation will raise an initial central seed fund (aiming for £75,000 - £100,000 in our first phase) to be allocated to participating school clubs to invest under clear guidelines.

• School-Centric Approach: Clubs will be student-run, with guidance from a dedicated school staff member (e.g., a Business or Economics teacher).

• Focus on UK Listed Investments: Clubs will invest in UK-listed assets. This focus not only provides a defined learning universe but also allows students to gain a practical understanding of domestic companies, their role in the national economy, and the dynamics of the UK market.

• Structured Learning & Career Insight: The Foundation will provide educational resources, ethical guidelines, and risk management frameworks, aiming to both teach investment principles and spark interest in related careers.

Building a Collaborative Ecosystem & Fostering Pathways

The success of the Sterling Investment Foundation hinges on strong partnerships designed to create tangible opportunities and broad impact:

• School Partnerships: Collaborating with secondary schools and colleges to identify enthusiastic students and integrate the investment clubs as incubators of talent and interest.

• Corporate Mentorship & Industry Access: Partnering with UK investment firms, engaging their employees as mentors (e.g., via CSR volunteering days). These mentors will offer real-world insights, demystify career paths, serve as role models, and help create networks for students, particularly those from diverse backgrounds.

• Centralised Platform & Transparent Monitoring: Managing all club investments through a reputable, centralised investment platform. The Foundation will have viewing access to monitor club portfolios, track performance, and gather data to refine the programme, ensuring accountability and sharing best practices.

Our Path Forward: Phased Rollout & Sustainable Impact

We are committed to a strategic and impactful launch:

1. Initial Funding Effort: Securing foundational funding (£75,000 - £100,000 target) for operations, legal advice, educational materials, and seed capital for the first cohort of clubs under the Sterling Investment Foundation.

2. Pilot Programme: Launching with a select group of diverse schools (e.g., 3-5 schools) to test and refine our model, resources, and mentorship programme, focusing on impact and learning.

3. Scaling for Broader Impact: Post-pilot, expanding the Sterling Investment Foundation to reach more schools and students. Our long-term ambition is to foster a new generation of informed investors engaged with UK businesses, contributing to a dynamic domestic investment landscape, and demonstrably adding to a more skilled and diverse talent pool for the financial services industry.

Our Commitment to Robust Delivery: Addressing Key Challenges

The Sterling Investment Foundation recognises that launching and scaling this ambitious initiative requires careful navigation of potential challenges. We are committed to a proactive and diligent approach, underpinned by detailed planning in several critical areas:

• Rigorous Governance, Legal & Compliance: Our foremost priority is establishing a robust legal and compliance framework. This includes obtaining specialist legal advice on FCA financial promotion rules and Charity Commission guidelines for programmatic investments, developing a comprehensive risk register, and implementing a best-practice safeguarding policy tailored to our unique activities. An ethical investment charter will guide all club activities.

• Learning from Established Models: We will incorporate insights and best practices from successful student-managed investment programmes at the university level to inform our programme design, risk management frameworks, and mentorship structures.

• Effective Programme Design & Support: The operational model for seed funding, including the mechanics of grants and management of returns, will be clearly defined. We are committed to providing intensive training, high-quality resources, and ongoing support for teachers. Formal agreements with schools and a carefully selected investment platform partner will ensure clarity and smooth operation.

• Strategic Collaboration & Sustainable Impact: We will seek strategic alliances with existing financial education providers to enhance our offering and avoid duplication. Deep, multi-year partnerships with financial services firms will be cultivated for sustainable funding, mentorship, and pathway opportunities. A diversified funding model and a rigorous impact measurement framework are central to our long-term vision.

• Pilot Programme as a Learning Hub: The initial pilot programme will be instrumental for testing all assumptions, gathering extensive feedback, stress-testing compliance and safeguarding, and refining the model before any broader scaling.

These points represent a summary of detailed strategic considerations that will form the bedrock of our operational planning, ensuring the Foundation is built on strong, sustainable, and ethical principles.

We Welcome Your Insights & Expertise

This proposal for the Sterling Investment Foundation is a working draft, and your insights are invaluable as we refine our approach. We are particularly keen to hear from professionals with experience in the non-profit, education, and investment sectors. Your perspective on the overall feasibility of this initiative, its potential impact, and any blind spots we might have overlooked would be immensely helpful.

We encourage you to share your thoughts on the core programme design, ideas for building effective partnerships with schools and financial firms, and considerations for ensuring the long-term sustainability and scalability of the Foundation. All constructive feedback, advice, and critical perspectives are welcome, as they will contribute significantly to shaping this initiative.

Please share your comments below. We are also open to exploring potential collaborations with individuals and organisations passionate about this mission. If you prefer to discuss your feedback in more detail, subscribers are welcome to email me directly at sterlinginvestmentreport@substack.com.

Share

• Restore plc (RST): Positive Trading and Strategic Acquisitions Fuel Growth

• Volvere plc (VLE): Strong 2024 Results Driven by Shire Foods, NAV Jumps

• Renew Holdings plc (RNWH): HY25 Diversification & Strategic Shifts Drive Growth Despite Rail Headwinds

• Warehouse REIT PLC (WHR): Update on Blackstone Takeover Talks, PUSU Deadline Extended

• Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE): Q1 Growth, New CEO, Shareholder Returns & Catastrophe Impact

• H&T Group PLC (HAT): Agrees to £297M Takeover by FirstCash

• Kinovo PLC (KINO) – Recommended Cash Acquisition by Sureserve

• Assura PLC (AGR): PHP Tables Competing £1.68bn Offer, Challenging KKR Consortium

Subscribe now

Restore plc (RST): Positive Trading and Strategic Acquisitions Fuel Growth [SP: 252.5p, MC: £342M]

• Positive Start to 2025 & Confident Outlook: Restore plc reported increased revenues for the first four months of 2025, driven by core services, and the Board remains confident in achieving full-year profit growth expectations across all divisions.

• Strategic Acquisitions Enhance Growth: The company accelerated its growth strategy by acquiring Synertec (Holdings Ltd) for £22 million to boost document management, particularly for the public sector.

• Datashred Division Strengthened: Two bolt-on acquisitions in April 2025, Shred-on-Site (£7.9 million) and Shred First UK (£0.3 million), expanded the Datashred division, with Shred-on-Site expected to add c.£3.5 million to revenue in the remainder of 2025.

• Next Update: The Group will publish its half-year results, providing further details on performance and integration, on Tuesday, July 29, 2025.

Volvere plc (VLE): Strong 2024 Results Driven by Shire Foods, NAV Jumps [SP: 2100p, MC: £46M]

• Stellar Profit Growth: Volvere reported a 74.2% increase in Group profit before tax from continuing operations to £6.34 million for the year ended 31 December 2024, with revenue up 14.2% to £49.04 million.

• Shire Foods Shines: The excellent performance was primarily driven by its 80%-owned food manufacturing subsidiary, Shire Foods, which saw its own profit before tax (and intra-group charges) rise by 59.8% to £6.17 million on revenues of £49.04 million.

• NAV & Shareholder Returns: Consolidated Net Assets Per Share (NAV) increased by 16.0% to £17.20, complemented by £1.51 million in share buybacks during the year.

• Robust Financial Position: The Group ended the year with a strong balance sheet, holding £27.84 million in cash and available-for-sale investments, providing significant capacity for future investments.

• Acquisition Focus & Outlook: Volvere is actively seeking new acquisition opportunities, particularly in the food sector but remains sector-agnostic, and expresses confidence for a robust performance in 2025 despite acknowledging cost pressures.

• Capital Allocation Policy: No dividend was declared, consistent with the company's policy to reinvest profits or buy back shares; management highlights ongoing challenges from higher employment and supply chain costs.

Renew Holdings plc (RNWH): HY25 Diversification & Strategic Shifts Drive Growth Despite Rail Headwinds [SP: 849p, MC: £672M]

• Mixed Financials but Strong Revenue Growth: Renew reported a 13% rise in Group revenue to £569.3m for the six months to 31 March 2025; however, adjusted operating profit dipped 1% to £32.0m due to Rail sector delays, impacting adjusted EPS (down 7.6% to 28.2p). An increased interim dividend of 6.7p (+5.4%) signals confidence.

• Strategic Transformation to Pureplay Engineering: The Group exited Specialist Building and strengthened its engineering focus with key acquisitions: Full Circle (renewable energy services) and Excalon (electricity transmission & distribution), both integrating well and opening new growth avenues.

• Rail Sector Navigating Challenges: Delays in Rail programme mobilisations under CP7 impacted profitability. However, Renew anticipates conditions will normalise and is seeing increased demand for reactive maintenance, supported by Network Rail's ongoing £45.4bn CP7 commitment.

• Water Sector Delivers Strong Performance: The Water division is performing ahead of expectations, with Renew strongly positioned for the significantly expanded AMP8 cycle (£45bn addressable market), now working with 13 UK water companies.

• Energy & Infrastructure Show Promise: The Energy division is set for growth, leveraging new acquisitions in renewables and T&D, alongside opportunities in Nuclear. Infrastructure, particularly Highways, benefits from expected increased investment (RIS3).

• Confident Outlook with Record Order Book: Despite Rail headwinds, a record order book of £908m and a diversified business model underpin management's confidence in delivering against revised full-year expectations, anticipated to be ahead of the prior year.

Warehouse REIT PLC (WHR): Update on Blackstone Takeover Talks, PUSU Deadline Extended [SP: 98.60p, MC: £418.91M]

• Blackstone's Offer Encounters Hurdle: Blackstone's indicative cash offer of 115p per share (adjusted for a 1.6p dividend) for Warehouse REIT is now uncertain.

• Valuation Disagreement: Following due diligence, Blackstone has raised concerns, primarily citing a differing valuation of Warehouse REIT's Radway Green development asset, and has stated that it cannot currently proceed on the initial terms.

• PUSU Deadline Extended: To allow for further discussion, the Takeover Panel has extended the Put Up or Shut Up (PUSU) deadline for Blackstone to either make a firm offer or withdraw its interest from May 12, 2025, to May 30, 2025.

• Negotiations Ongoing: The board of Warehouse REIT is actively engaging with Blackstone and its advisors to address the valuation concerns and highlight the potential value of the assets.

• Offer Terms and Uncertainty: The initial offer was stated as "final" unless a rival bidder emerges. Blackstone also retains the option to reduce its offer under certain conditions. Significant uncertainty remains as to whether a firm offer will materialise and, if so, at what price.

Conduit Holdings Ltd (CRE): Q1 2025 Growth, New CEO, Shareholder Returns & Catastrophe Impact [SP: 370p, MC: £612M]

• Leadership Change and Shareholder Returns: Neil Eckert has been appointed Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and the Board has approved a new share buyback programme of up to $50 million, underscoring confidence in the company's intrinsic value.

• Strong Premium Growth: Conduit achieved a 15.0% increase in gross premiums written, reaching $410.2 million, with growth recorded across all its Property, Casualty, and Specialty reinsurance segments.

• Catastrophe Impact and Mitigation: The company is managing the impact of a challenging quarter for catastrophe losses. It maintains its previously stated net loss estimate of $100-$140 million for the California wildfires and has secured additional reinsurance to reduce future earnings volatility.

• Solid Investment Performance and RoE Outlook: The investment portfolio returned 2.1% in the first quarter (Q1). While the 2025 Return on Equity (RoE) is forecast to be in the high single-digit to low double-digit range due to catastrophe events, Conduit remains confident in its mid-teens RoE target throughout the economic cycle.

• Attractive Pricing Despite Moderation: Although overall risk-adjusted rates experienced a slight decrease of (4)%, pricing levels and terms remain attractive following several years of market improvements. Strong client relationships continue to support business acquisition.

H&T Group PLC (HAT): Agrees to £297 Million Takeover by US Pawnbroking Giant FirstCash [SP: 646p, MC: £280M]

• Acquisition Offer: US-based FirstCash Holdings, Inc. has made a recommended final cash offer to acquire UK pawnbroker H&T Group PLC for 661 pence per share. This offer comprises 650p in cash and an 11p H&T dividend, valuing H&T at approximately £297 million.

• Significant Premium: The offer represents a substantial premium of approximately 44% to H&T's recent closing price and a 71-78% premium to its three to six-month volume-weighted average prices (VWAPs). This valuation is higher than any level at which H&T shares have previously traded on AIM.

• Board Recommendation and Rationale: H&T's Board has unanimously recommended the offer, viewing it as an attractive opportunity for shareholders to realise immediate cash value and de-risk their investment in light of future market uncertainties. This recommendation follows a negotiation process during which initial lower offers were rejected.

• Acquirer Profile and Strategy: FirstCash is a major pawn operator in the US and Latin America. This acquisition marks its strategic entry into the UK market. The company aims to create the largest publicly traded pawn platform across the US, Latin America, and the UK by leveraging H&T's established presence.

• Conditions and Timeline: The deal, structured as a scheme of arrangement, is subject to H&T shareholder approval, regulatory approvals from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), and Court sanction. Completion is anticipated in the second half of 2025.

Kinovo PLC (KINO) – Recommended Cash Acquisition by Sureserve [SP: 85p, MC: £53M]

• Sureserve's Recommended Offer: Sureserve Compliance Holdings Limited has made a recommended final cash offer to acquire Kinovo PLC at 87.5 pence per share, valuing Kinovo at approximately £56.4 million.

• Significant Premium: The offer represents a 41.1% premium to Kinovo's closing price on 9 May 2025 (the last business day before the offer period commenced). Sureserve has stated that the terms are final unless a rival bid emerges.

• Strong Shareholder Support: The Kinovo Board has unanimously recommended the offer. Furthermore, Sureserve has already received irrevocable undertakings and a letter of intent supporting the deal from shareholders representing approximately 47.05% of Kinovo's issued share capital.

• Strategic Rationale: The acquisition aims to combine the complementary strengths of Sureserve and Kinovo, particularly Kinovo's expertise in electrical compliance services. This combination is intended to enhance their offering in the social housing and public sectors, with a strategic focus on decarbonisation and future growth.

• Process and Timeline: The acquisition is planned to proceed via a Court-sanctioned scheme of arrangement, which will require shareholder and Court approvals. It is expected to become effective by early July 2025.

Assura PLC (AGR): PHP Tables Competing £1.68bn Share & Cash Offer, Challenging KKR Consortium [SP: 49.62p, MC: £1.61B]

• Offer Details: Primary Health Properties (PHP) offers 0.3769 new PHP shares plus 12.5p cash for each Assura share. Assura shareholders also retain up to 1.68p in dividends, leading to an implied total value of 51.7p per share, valuing Assura at £1.68 billion.

• Premium Offer: This represents a 4.7% premium to the KKR-Stonepeak consortium's 49.4p cash offer and a 38.2% premium to Assura's undisturbed share price before the offer period.

• Strategic Rationale: The combination aims to create the UK's 9th largest listed REIT, a dominant specialist in primary healthcare property with a £6 billion combined portfolio, enhanced market presence, and improved access to capital.

• Financial Benefits: PHP anticipates annual pre-tax cost synergies of ~£9 million, driving earnings accretion and dividend growth. The combined entity is expected to benefit from embedded rental growth and the value of existing low-cost debt.

• Shareholder Impact & Structure: Post-completion, Assura shareholders would own ~48% of the combined group. The deal is a reverse takeover for PHP, thus requiring PHP shareholder approval, and is not conditional on antitrust approvals.

• Key Conditions & Timeline: The offer is conditional on, among other things, 75% Assura shareholder acceptance (can be lowered to >50%). Completion is anticipated in Q3 2025, with offer documents expected by mid-June 2025.